My own view is that the Working Test has probably done more for the handlers than it has for the dogs.
Gundog Training Forum
"Gundog Training
made Easy" is based on the Gundog Training Broadsheets and contains additional
material.
The original Broadsheets are still available for download for those who prefer them by
clicking here.
| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
TheONeile |
Does the team think.................... |
Lead | |
|
.......that working tests are a good thing or a bad thing?
My own view is that the Working Test has probably done more for the handlers than it has for the dogs. |
|||
MattA99 |
|||
|
I don't think tests do a lot of harm. The four tests that I've taken part in this year is probably as many as I've ever done in a Summer, and
I'll probably do a few more over the next three months.
They've pushed me on to do a bit more training than i normally would have done at this time of the year, and given me a few pointers to things I can be working on with my dog's training. With a retriever, pretty much all they do is retrieve when told to do so, so the variety and development comes from the different scenarios, terrains, cover and obstacles that they may have to face. Tests can give this bit of extra variety and experience to the handler and the dog. They do provide a bit of fun for the handlers, but I also feel that they have aided in the development of the training and handling skills of some newcomers who are then able to go and compete with the big boys. Luck still plays a bit of a part, but there is a much more level playing field for all the competitors than in a field trial. With the over-subscription of retriever trials, they provide a step into gundog competition for those that are perhaps not ready, or not able to make the commitment for field trials, and a bit of Summer practise for those that are. There isn't the kudos to be gained by winning as there is in field trials, but I quite like the competitive side and its quite nice to know that on a given weekend (without having to take a days holiday) I can go and take part in a test. Some people do take it fairly seriously, but I don't get the impression that they do so at the expense of the dogs or their working ability on game. You may be right in it doing more for the handlers, but all the dogs seem to enjoy themselves. They get a day out of the kennel, with one-to-one attention from their owner, with the chance of a few retrieves. I've done a few spaniel tests in the past. They're a bit of fun, but they don't generally seems to have the variety or depth of retriever tests. Matt |
|||
Eric Begbie |
|||
|
I think they are a good thing and, the less formal they are, the better. They encourage an interest in gundog work during the close season when most gundogs
are having an enforced 6½-month lay-off. They also bring the work of gundogs in front of spectators.
I don't know much about the "formal" tests such, run by actual gundog clubs, such as those that Matt has being doing so well in but I have enjoyed, and occasionally participated in (a long time ago), the more informal (anyone can come and have a go) tests that are run at country fairs and the tests run by wildfowling clubs throughout the summer. Even got my name on a few trophies for the latter!! Some other things that I like about those tests are that they are essentially for working dogs that are never trialled (although sometimes trial dogs are entered - and beaten -alongside ordinary dogs) and the fact that retrievers and spaniels compete against each-other. I also think the "dog and gun" type of event involving clay shooting and gundog test help to generate interest and provide fun for both participants and spectators. |
|||
crackerd |
|||
|
The whole thing's getting to une idee Americaine for me.
(Like a million or so working tests--a/k/a hunt tests--a year from a thousand or so alphabet--souped organizations.) MG |
|||
Windem Bang |
|||
|
About 30 years ago I was a part of the Scottish team that took part in the big Scotland ,Ireland, England and Wales team gundog event at the big game
fair held,that year, in England. ( Us Scots trashed you'se yins !!! One of the English competitors was the man who had won the previous seasons trial - the Retriever Championships. I was at those Championships and his dog
was terrific ! A really good game finder that went out there and did the job with little handling needed. This dog did very poorly at the game fair test , I
think it may have had the lowest individual mark.. I knew the dogs owner fairly well from having competed against him in trials. He told me he had been
"persuaded" that the Retriever Championship Winner simply had to take part in the game fair test. My words to him that he hadn't done himself any
favours were, if I've been correctly informed , only too prophetic. The dog (a male lab) that had the highest marks at the game fair test that year had
more bitches taken to it for stud than the Championship Trial winner ! I thought then that things were going a bit wrong.
|
|||
The Big Red Fox |
|||
|
All,
I think that the tests are a good way of introducing newbies to the sport which they otherwise may never get into. I know that a test cannot be likened to a trial but it does keep the interest in the dog and keep the training going during the summer months when the season is at a close, it can be fun and is often not as competitive as a trial. Like with a trial the handler and the dog have to demonstrate all the attributes that can be associated with the field, though the course will have been laid out rather than as it comes in a trial situation. As someone who is keen on dogs and trialing I think that it should be noted that there is a marked difference in trials and tests but each taken in their own context can do no harm what so ever to the gundog world. In fact in some instances (game fairs and country fairs) it can only lift the profile of gundogs, it's a great social event for handlers and provides entertainment to all. Long may they continue.
Adam __________________ "24 hours in a day, 24 beers in a case. Coincidence? I think not." |
|||
Des ONeile |
|||
|
The original "worry" was that there would evolve a third type of dog a lighter faster dog for the relatively easy conditions in a test. It
doesn't seem to have happened, or has it?
|
|||
Windem Bang |
|||
|
That was my fear 25 -30 years ago. I now think that fear was unfounded. A racier type, a third type, does not seem to have developed, not that I've
noticed among the labs anyway.,
|
|||
The Big Red Fox |
|||
|
Bill
I think that people know and respect the breed for what it is and true trialling guys who breed do so for the right reasons and that is to further the breed, certainly the guys I train with do I am convinced of that. It's great to see a dog with style and pace even on dummies, but as you will know when they get amongst game they really come into there own.
Adam __________________ "24 hours in a day, 24 beers in a case. Coincidence? I think not." |
|||
Windem Bang |
|||
|
Agreed Adam, I'll drink to that !
Bill T. |
|||
crackerd |
|||
Des ONeile wrote: Des, ironically it's an au contraire thing in the US when it comes to retrievers. Dogs that run "hunt tests" are often too supercharged,
"too much dog," for the task. Thus the tests are made increasingly difficult through "tricks" that will fail the dog rather than the
dog's getting dropped due to inability to perform. Not least of these tricks involves live birds (in KC tests) shot at very short distances.
|
|||
Windem Bang |
|||
|
MG , is it the case then in the States that retrievers are being bred to win under test situations that bear little resemblance to real shooting ? Sorry if
that sounds a bit rude but I couldn't see how to put it nicely.
In this country we are beginning to see something of the same mentality arising at Hunt- Point- Retriever tests. In some puppy tests for these breeds the pups are now required to do heel free heelwork and sometimes short duration stays with the handler out of sight ! When I read about that happening I was horrified. I have won H.P.R. trials and been to the championships , that kind of obedience isn't required there - none of my dogs would pass a stay with handler out of sight test. Yet now it is being asked for in puppy tests ! I think this is done to put pups out not to keep them in but mark them. I think it is very much a step in the wrong direction. Bill T. |
|||
crackerd |
|||
|
Bill, of course the contention with US field trials is "that dog don't hunt"--literally and figuratively, but that's wide of the mark
(literally and figuratively). In actuality, their breeding pales next to the potential for becoming working gundogs as they are trained up.
"Becoming" may never translate to "became" but.that is the owner's prerogative. Which is to say even if a FT retriever never put paw in
a hide in its life, it nevertheless has had inculcated every facet necessary to become the finest of fowling dogs.
|
|||